An investigation of Main Street and how it got that way. Block by Block. Looking at Main Street as a street (per Jane Jacobs). I look at street front retail, storefront business that has some public interaction (no professional offices or beauty schools), but things like stores, loan companys, restaurants, theatere, and so forth.
No arcade or lobby business (as much as possible)...just things that face the street, as a gauge on how active or lively the street is
Here is the rough cut, where I graph the businesses. I also lay in things that affect the retail environment, particularly the suburban competition.
Then a look block by block, from Monument to the railroad embankment.
Then looking in some detail at the blocks. I note physical changes (like the opening of a larger store) that impacts the count. First, the two blocks north of Third:
Next, the two blocks south of Third:
Note that some of the largest drops are from physcial alterations driving removals of buildings, reducing the number of storefronts. This implys that, though retail was declining, some urban renewal and new construction decisions also had an impact, and accelerated the decline.
I will take a look at a the retail mix next.
For a more in-depth treatment follow this link:
The Decline and Fall of Main Street
Sunday, November 25, 2007
The Fall of Main Street, Block by Block
Monday, September 17, 2007
Urban Nights Inspires the Bloggers (but whats goin' on?)
Two of the more urban affairs oriented Dayton blogs are abuzz after Urban Nights, which apparently was quite an event.
Esrati has come up with a list of pretty good ideas on how to improve downtown. And Bill @ Dayton Most Metro has a great call to action directed at not just at the political leadership but also at local citizens and buisnesses. I particularly liked the Most Metro post as it was fairly inspirational and makes me wish we had more urban evangelists like Bill around town.
Yet what is really the plan for downtownton? As Marvin Gaye sang, "Whats Goin' On?"
Well, everything is pretty close-hold here, isn't it? We know about Ballpark Village. But what else?
I found something online. A planning document prepared by Citywide Development. And it is chilling. Apparently this is going to be an economic development part of the Daytons city plan and is recent, from June of this year:
CitiPlan 2020 Focus 2010 and Beyond
Economic Development Component
(2007).
4.2.3.2. New Product and Reuse. Create new building product that is more aligned with the demands of today’s marketplace by providing:
* large horizontal floor plates
* close in parking and other amenities.
Find reuses for obsolete office buildings that can be transformed into non-traditional re-uses”
4.2.3.4. Downtown Office Space….Work with community partners to develop strategic shovel-ready sites for potential development”.
So, what does this bureaucratic bafflegab mean? Well, it means they are going to finish the job started by urban renwal in the 1960s. The concept is large flat or low buildings ("...large horizontal floor plates...")and adjacent parking and maybe lunchtime restaurants and dry cleaners and such ("...close in parking and other amenities...")The idea is to maybe use Port Authority or other agencies to clear sites and remediate hazamats to provide empty property that could compete with surburban office parks for potential development("...Work with community partners to develop strategic shovel-ready sites..."). Conceptually this would be akin to what Kettering did with Hills and Dales or what UD is doing with the NCR site.
So it's back to the future. Examples of large horizontal floor plates with close-in parking built on shovel-ready sites, downtown, from the 1960s...
...groovy, baby. But what about that city income tax?